menu
  • Our Story

    • Overview
    • Careers
    • Locations
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Community Involvement
    • Firm Leadership
    • History
    • Alumni
    • Affiliations
    • Media Inquiries
    • Make a Payment
  • Our People

  • Our Insights

    • Events/CLE
    • Publications
    • News
    • Blogs
  • Our Practices & Industries

    • Business
      • Business Transitions
      • Construction
      • Corporate, Securities, and M&A
      • ERISA, Life, Health & Disability
      • Finance & Banking
      • Health Care Transactions
      • Intellectual Property Transactions
      • Immigration
      • Labor, Employment & Benefits
      • Private Investment Funds
      • Private Client Services
      • Real Estate
      • Startups & Emerging Companies
      • Tax
      • Wage & Hour
    • Litigation
      • Antitrust, Competition & Trade
      • Appellate
      • Class Actions
      • Commercial Litigation
      • Construction
      • Creditors' Rights & Bankruptcy
      • Electronic Discovery, Technology & Strategy
      • ERISA, Life, Health & Disability
      • Fiduciary Litigation
      • Financial Institutions Litigation & Investigations
      • Insurance
      • Intellectual Property Litigation
      • International Arbitration
      • Labor, Employment & Benefits
      • Securities & Corporate Governance Litigation
      • Wage & Hour
    • Industries
      • Blockchain & Cryptocurrency
      • Food, Beverage & Hospitality
      • Government Law
      • Investigations, Compliance & White Collar
      • Japan Practice
      • Nonprofit & Social Enterprise
      • Privacy & Data Security
      • Senior Living & Long Term Care
      • Transportation
    • Services
      • COVID-19 Landlord/Tenant Response Team
      • COVID-19 Resource Center
      • Business Dispute Resolution
  • Our Locations

    • Anchorage
    • Portland
    • Seattle
  • Our Careers

    • Attorneys
    • Summer Associates
    • Professional Staff
  • Our Diversity

    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Our Story
Lane Powell Web Site
  • OUR PEOPLE
  • STORY
  • INSIGHTS
  • PRACTICES & INDUSTRIES
Search
  • 日本語
  • 中文
  • 한국어
Email this pagePrint this pagePrint to PDF

Intellectual Property Litigation

Our Intellectual Property (IP) Litigation Team includes nationally- and internationally-recognized patent, copyright and trademark lawyers with extensive experience representing clients in complex intellectual property dispute resolution. We have the technical knowledge and advocacy skills to successfully help you protect your brand, your art or your invention.  

Our representative clients include:

  • Adelos, Inc.;
  • Aviation Partners, Inc.;
  • Accretive Technology Group;
  • Corbis;
  • Umpqua Bank;
  • Ericsson Television, Inc.;
  • Skechers USA, Inc.;
  • Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.;
  • Lundberg, LLC;
  • Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research; and
  • Intelius.

We serve as fierce, knowledgeable advocates for clients in litigation in state and federal courts. Our experience also includes helping clients resolve international intellectual property disputes. We represent clients in matters related to:

  • Trademark infringement;
  • Trade secrets;
  • False Advertising;
  • Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings;
  • Consumer Protection Act claims;
  • Rights of publicity;
  • Copyright infringement;
  • Domain names;
  • Trade dress;
  • Deceptive trade practices;
  • International Trade Commission claims;
  • Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) claims;
  • Patent infringement;
  • Software agreement claims;
  • Plant patents;
  • Trademark Trial and Appeal Board proceedings; and
  • IP licensing disputes.

Our Approach

We work with clients to identify whether litigation is the right path, providing them with an early case assessment that brings together our analysis of the facts, our decades of experience and our technical knowledge of the issue at hand. We work seamlessly with members of our Intellectual Property Transactions team to identify possible risks and creative solutions that could help you reach your goals without litigation.

Should litigation be determined to be the right path forward, we make sure we have the best team on the case and work collaboratively with you to develop a case strategy and budget for the matter.  

Shared Risk

Our team is fortunate to work at a firm that provides a platform that allows us to share in risk with our clients. We are open to success-based litigation arrangements, and will take on contingency cases meeting the right criteria.

  • Earth and Table Law Reporter | A Law Blog
  • Awards_Best Law Firms 2023

Contact

  • Tiffany Connors
    D.206.223.7267
    connorst@lanepowell.com

Related Practices & Industries

  • Commercial Litigation
  • Food, Beverage & Hospitality
  • Intellectual Property Transactions
  • International Arbitration
  • International IP Dispute Resolution
  • Litigation
  • Startups & Emerging Companies

 

 

  • World Trademark Review 1000

Get to Know Us

Experience

  • Benson v. NFC Data, Inc.
    Case No. 1:12cv1161, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63115
    Lead defense counsel in patent ownership proceeding in the Virginia Eastern District Court (“rocket docket”) and prevailed for client in preliminary injunction proceedings.
  • A. H. Lundberg Associates, Inc. v. TSI, Inc.
    Case No. 2:14-CV-01160U.S. District Court, Western District of WashingtonSeattle, Washington
    Represented client Lundberg LLC in trade secret litigation through trial, secured injunction and attorneys’ fees, and argued expert-related claim at the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
  • Fruit Farmer Right of Publicity Case
    Resolved a right of publicity (personality rights) case brought by a former model.
  • Evergreen Safety Council v. RSA Network, Inc.
    Case No. 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64261 aff’d 697 F.3d 1221, 104 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1380, Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 30,333 U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
    Successfully defended Evergreen Safety Council in defeating a copyright infringement claim filed by RSA for the use of traffic safety diagrams and text.
  • Alaskasland v. Kevin Cross, et. al
    Successfully defended realtor defendants and obtained a complete summary judgment victory against claims for misappropriation, trademark infringement and defamation among others. Appeal now pending.
  • Coble v. Anita Renfroe, LLC et al
    Case No. 2:2011cv00498U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington
    Successfully defended author and entertainer Anita Renfroe in a copyright and trademark infringement suit.
  • Recaro North America, Inc. v. Speedware Motorsports
    Successfully defended respondent in World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) domain name dispute.
  • Mirina Corp. v. Marina Biotech, Inc.
    Successfully defended against a preliminary injunction motion in trademark infringement case.
  • Attachmate Corporation v. Celcom Axiata Berhad
    Case No. 2:2010cv00526U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington
    Successfully represented the largest cellular phone company in Malaysia and obtained a complete victory against claims brought by Seattle-based software company Attachmate Corporation. Attachmate had sued Celcom for copyright infringement and breach of contract arising out of the alleged over-installation of software. Attachmate sought damages of more than $5 million. Celcom moved to dismiss the complaint based on copyright doctrines of extraterritoriality and preemption, as well as personal jurisdiction.  Judge Ricardo Martinez granted Celcom’s motion in its entirety.
  • Electric Mirror LLC v. Janmar Lighting Inc.
    Obtained dismissal in suit seeking declaratory judgment of non-infringement and/or invalidity of Janmar’s patent based on lack of personal jurisdiction over defendant, Janmar Lighting, Inc.
  • Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Prima Bella Produce, Inc
    Case No. 1:10-cv-00148-LJOU.S. District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFresno, California
    Defended Prima Bella Produce against federal and state claims for trademark infringement, dilution and unfair competition brought by Gerawan Farming, a case that ended in a confidential settlement agreement.
  • FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Sierra Media, Inc. et al
    Case No. 3:2010cv00971U.S. District Court, District of Oregon
    We represented Fluke Corporation against false advertising claims filed by a competitor, FLIR Systems, Inc., in a nine-day jury trial at the U.S. District Court of Oregon.
  • Defended Trademark Infringement Claims for a Global Nutrition and Weight Management Company
    U.S. District Court, District of Oregon
    Represented global nutritional products company in suit involving alleged trademark infringement and breach of contract.
  • adidas America, Inc. et al v. Skechers USA, Inc.
    Case No. 3:15-cv-01741-HZU.S. District Court, District of Oregon
    Defending Skechers, as local counsel, against trademark and trade dress infringement, dilution, unfair competition and breach of contract claims asserted by adidas.
  • Attachmate Corporation v. Tarmac Ltd.
    Case No. 2:2008cv01370U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington
    Defended Tarmac Ltd. in a multi-million dollar defense of a software copyright infringement lawsuit.
  • Attachmate v. HealthNet
    Case No. C09-1161 MJPU.S. District Court, Western District of WashingtonSeattle, Washington
    Defended Computer Talk on a copyright infringement dispute initiated by Attachmate, a software company, for the alleged infringement of its software programs and breach of licenses, one of a number of times we have defended companies sued by Attachmate.
  • Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Pelican Butte Oil, LLC
    Case No. 1:10-cv-03063U.S. District Court, District of Oregon
    Represented Chevron in a series of unfair competition; trademark infringement and dilution; and deceptive and unlawful trade practices suits.
  • Cassidian Communications, Inc. v. Synergem Emergency Communications, LLC et al
    Case No. 6:13-cv-00216-CEH-TBSU.S. District Court, Middle District of Florida
    Defending Synergem Technologies in a bet-the-company case alleging claims under a patent for a system and method for supporting multiple call centers.
  • Chevron Corporation Unfair Competition and Trademark Matters
    Represented Chevron in a series of unfair competition; trademark infringement and dilution; and deceptive and unlawful trade practices suits.
  • Convergia Networks, Inc. and Future Electronics Inc. v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.*
    Represented Convergia Networks, Inc. in litigation involving breach of contract, fraudulent, inducement, and willful and wanton misconduct.
  • Collegenet, Inc. v. Google, Inc.
    Case No. 10-cv-01211U.S. District Court, District of Oregon
    Acted as co-counsel successfully defending Google in a trademark infringement suit brought by CollegeNet over a Speedbook mark. After CollegeNet moved for a preliminary injunction and Google cross-moved for a pre-answer dismissal, the parties agreed to stay the case and later to dismiss the case with prejudice.
  • Donuts, Inc. v. Rightside Group, Ltd.
    Represented Rightside in arbitration, in one of the first cases in the country testing the scope and definitions of registry service agreements.
  • Enterprises International, Inc. v. International Knife & Saw, Inc.
    Case No. C12-5638 BHS, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 101375; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) ¶ 30,641, recons. denied, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 124221U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington
    Defended International Knife and Saw, a South Carolina-based manufacturing company, against claims for the misappropriation of intellectual property.
  • GeoTag Inc v. Frontier Communications Corp et al
    Case No. 2:2010-cv-00265U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
    Defended Intelius/inome in a patent infringement suit for a locator service, alleging that that Intelius infringes a patent for database searches that are both geographical and topical.
  • Golden Temple of Oregon, LLC v. Puri
    Case No. 12-10-03055U.S. District Court, District of Oregon
    Represented Golden Temple in this case involving a demand to inspect records pursuant to a licensing arrangement, an inspection of which our clients disputed the scope as too broad.
  • Haute Bride-Haute Jewels, LLC v. Nordstrom Inc.
    Case No. 2:13-cv-01755-RSMU.S. District Court, Western District of Washington
    Defended Nordstrom against copyright and false-designation-of-origin claims stemming from a bridal headband.
  • Julep Beauty, Inc. Patent Infringement Claims by Eclipse IP
    Assisted Julep, a leader in the cosmetics industry, in responding to patent infringement allegations made by Eclipse IP.
  • Kforce Inc. v. Oxenhandler
    Case No. 2:14-cv-00774-MJPU.S. District Court, Western District of WashingtonSeattle, Washington
    Represented Kforce, a specialty-staffing firm, who brought a trade secret and unfair competition suit against two former employees and a recruiting firm. Obtained highly favorable settlement at meditation. 
  • REC Software USA, Inc. v. Sony Mobile Communications (USA) Inc.
    Case No. 2:14-cv-01060-MJPU.S. District Court, Western District of Washington
    Defending Sony, and brought a declaratory judgment counterclaim, in this patent infringement suit concerning mobile electronic devices.
  • Union Square Partnership, Inc. v. Savitri Durkee*
    Represented Savitri Durkee in copyright infringement suit by Union Square Partnership. Counterclaimed and sought declaration of non-infringement of trademark, declaratory and injunctive relief under the Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. 114(2)(D)(v), and violation of New York Anti-SLAPP Act, N.Y. Civil Rights Law 70-a, 76-a.). Favorable settlement.
  • Viacom International Inc. et al. v. YouTube, Inc. et al.*
    Successfully represented YouTube, Inc. in copyright infringement suit by Viacom and related action by class plaintiffs.
  • Plant Patent Advice and Counsel
    Provided advice and counsel regarding plant patent rights in connection with a trademark dispute over certain patented and trademarked varietal plant names.
  • Rad Power Bikes v. Lectric Cycles
    Represented Rad Power Bikes in a USPTO trademark dispute over rights to the RAD family of marks in connection with electric bikes; case settled during pretrial discovery.
  • Expert Witness Consulting Regarding Food Composition Patenting
    Prepared expert witness consulting and expert witness report regarding the patentability of a U.S. food composition patent application in connection with a patent legal malpractice claim.
  • Convertpac Non-compete and Trade Secret Matter
    Filed declaratory judgment action to relieve purchaser of paper products business from covenant not to compete and common law trade secrets obligations arising from aborted purchase. Conducted bench trial and secured relief from covenant well beyond settlement offers.
  • First Union Non-compete and Trade Secrets Suit
    Defended recruiting firm and brokers in three cases brought by recruits’ former employer who alleged breach of non-compete and trade secrets misappropriation. Defeated injunctions and obtained small liability awards at arbitrations. 
  • Lewandowski v. Loring Ward, Pershing, FSC Securities and Terwedo
    Case No. 09-04075FINRA
    Appeared for investment adviser and clearing broker and induced counsel for claimant to dismiss those parties with prejudice. 
  • Lincoln Life Non-compete and Trade Secrets Suit
    Represented annuities issuer preliminarily enjoining former securities broker/insurance agent (who had no non-competition covenant in agency agreement) from competing unfairly, misleading customers and misappropriating trade secrets; dismissed $5 million sex discrimination counterclaims at hearing.
  • Canyons Restaurant Trademark Infringement Suit
    Won a preliminary injunction for a local restaurant enjoining trademark infringement by a national chain and resulting in the national chain changing its name in this area.
  • Heath & Company Trademark Infringement Suit
    Secured preliminary injunction in Seattle federal district court for trademark infringement and unfair competition on behalf of national sign company, then obtained favorable settlement of damages claims.
  • InstruMed, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew Richards Trademark Infringement Case
    Secured verdict of willful infringement and unfair competition in federal court jury trial and award of damages, costs and attorney fees.
  • Edward D. Jones & Co. L.P. v. Mark Anderson
    Case No. 12-2-34362-4 SEAKing County Superior Court
    Obtained dismissal of TRO motion against financial advisor who had transferred to new firm and "announced his new employment" instead of soliciting in violation of employment contract provisions and the trade secrets act, then procured highly favorable settlement. 
  • Bostwick Laboratories v. Cortex Medical Management Systems
    Multiple claims related to software systems designed for pathology laboratories.
  • Callison Architecture Inc. v. Cordax Inc.
    Software development and trade secret dispute.
  • Rosie O’Donnell v. Entercom Portland
    Defense of trademark infringement and dilution and right of publicity claims and pursuit of antitrust and unclean hands affirmative defenses.
  • Microprobe Founder Employment and Intellectual Property Matter
    Worked out mutually satisfactory termination agreement separating out intellectual property of client, a founder of Microprobe, from that of former business.
  • Wade Cook v. Quantum Vision
    Opposed and defeated TRO and preliminary injunction motions brought by Wade Cook Seminars against former Wade Cook speakers, employees and competing seminar firms. Prevailed on the merits with small liability award in arbitration. 
  • Compana LLC v. Aetna, Inc.
    Case No. C05-0277L, 2006 WL 829111U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington
    Obtained summary judgment dismissal of claims for trademark infringement, unfair competition, anti-dilution, and for the violation of anti-cybersquatting consumer protection act and Washington consumer protection act regarding registration and use of domain name.
  • Wade Cook v. Tony Robbins
    Defended Robbins Research, Inc. and Tony Robbins in infringement and trade secrets case in state court in Washington brought by Wade Cook Seminars. Case settled favorably.
  • Shell v. Lindal Cedar Homes
    Won an arbitration award and judgment for copyright infringement for architectural works against a leading manufacturer of homes.

Intellectual Property Litigation

  • Heart, LLC v. Heart Pizza, LLC
    Representing award-winning coffee chain enforcing its trademark rights against infringing chain of pizza restaurants that established its flagship restaurant less than two blocks away from one of our client’s primary cafés.
* Denotes experience at a previous firm

Our Insights

  • November 3, 2022News
    US News – Best Lawyers® Ranks Lane Powell Among Nation’s Top Law Firms for 2023
    Awards & Honors
  • July 1, 2022News

    Fifteen Lane Powell Attorneys Recognized by Super Lawyers in Oregon for 2022

    Awards & Honors
  • November 4, 2021News
    US News – Best Lawyers® Ranks Lane Powell Among Nation’s Top Law Firms for 2022
    Awards & Honors
  • August 19, 2021News
    The Best Lawyers in America© 2022 Recognizes 90 Lane Powell Attorneys
    Awards & Honors
  • July 15, 2021News
    Forty-Three Lane Powell Attorneys Recognized by Super Lawyers for 2021
    Awards & Honors
  • May 20, 2021News
    Lane Powell Again Ranked Among Top Firms in 2021 Chambers® USA
    Awards & Honors
  • December 1, 2020Event / CLE
    Cutting Edge Transportation Issues for Litigation and Transactional Cases
    ProLawCLE | Virtual
  • November 5, 2020News
    US News – Best Lawyers® Ranks Lane Powell Among Nation’s Top Law Firms for 2021
    Awards & Honors
  • August 20, 2020News
    The Best Lawyers in America© 2021 Recognizes 92 Lane Powell Attorneys
    Awards & Honors
  • July 16, 2020News
    Thirty-Two Lane Powell Attorneys Recognized by Super Lawyers in Washington for 2020
    Awards & Honors
  • July 6, 2020News
    Ten Lane Powell Attorneys Recognized by Super Lawyers in Oregon for 2020
    Awards & Honors
  • April 23, 2020 News
    Lane Powell Again Ranked Among Top Firms in 2020 Chambers® USA
    Awards & Honors
  • February 24, 2020News
    K. Davis, Jagla and Swanson Recognized in 2020 World Trademark Review 1000
    Awards & Honors
  • November 1, 2019News
    US News – Best Lawyers® Ranks Lane Powell Among Nation’s Top Law Firms for 2020
    Awards & Honors
  • October 25, 2019Event / CLE
    Licensing in the Joint Development Context
    Law Seminars International | Seattle
  • September 9, 2019News
    In Memory of Jeffrey W. Reis
    Firm Announcement
  • August 15, 2019News
    The Best Lawyers in America© 2020 Recognizes 63 Lane Powell Attorneys
    Awards & Honors
  • July 5, 2019News
    Twenty-one Lane Powell Attorneys Recognized by Super Lawyers in Alaska and Oregon
    Awards & Honors
  • June 10, 2019News
    Thirty-one Lane Powell Attorneys Named ‘Washington Super Lawyers’ and Nine Named ‘Washington Rising Stars’
    Awards & Honors
  • June 4, 2019News
    Lane Powell Announces New Leaders, Reinforcing Focus on Innovation & Talent
    Firm Announcement
  • April 30, 2019News
    Swanson Quoted in LA Times Article ‘A Legal Conflict Brings a Sour Note to the Sweet History of California Strawberries’
    In the News
  • April 26, 2019News
    Lane Powell Again Ranked Among Top Firms in 2019 Chambers® USA
    Awards & Honors
  • April 9, 2019News
    Swanson Quoted in Bloomberg BNA Article ‘Driscoll’s Strawberry Dispute Could Sweeten Plant Patent Case Law’
    In the News
  • January/February 2019Publication
    Olney vs. Nelson vs. Beard: The Recipe Copyright Bout of the 20th Century
    IP Litigator
  • December 6, 2018Event / CLE
    Fifth Annual Startups Seminar: Celebrating the Pacific Northwest’s Startup Ecosystem
    Lane Powell Seminar | Seattle
  • November 1, 2018News
    US News – Best Lawyers® Ranks Lane Powell Among Nation’s Top Law Firms for 2019
    Awards & Honors
  • October 12, 2018News
    Lane Powell Highly Recommended in Benchmark Litigation 2019
    Awards & Honors
  • August 15, 2018News
    The Best Lawyers in America© 2019 Recognizes 62 Lane Powell Attorneys
    Awards & Honors
  • July 24, 2018News
    Twenty-three Lane Powell Attorneys Recognized by Super Lawyers in Alaska and Oregon
    Awards & Honors
  • June 18, 2018News
    Thirty-two Lane Powell Attorneys Named ‘Washington Super Lawyers’ and 14 Named ‘Washington Rising Stars’
    Awards & Honors
  • February 13, 2018News
    IP Teams Recognized by World Trademark Review 1000 for Fifth Consecutive Year
    Awards & Honors
  • November 1, 2017News
    U.S. News and Best Lawyers Ranks Lane Powell Among the Nation’s Top Law Firms for 2018
    Awards & Honors
  • October 3, 2017Publication
    Don’t Be the Next Headline: Protect Your Company’s Trade Secrets!
    Seattle Business Magazine
  • September 5, 2017News
    Swanson Featured in NPR ‘The Salt’ Blog Post ‘The Rise of Mock Meat: How Its Story Reflects America’s Ever-Changing Values’
    In the News
  • August 15, 2017News
    Fifty-nine Lane Powell Attorneys Named in The Best Lawyers® in America 2018
    Awards & Honors
  • May 11, 2017Event / CLE
    Some Pros and Cons of Litigating Patent Cases in the Eastern District of Texas
    Seattle IP American Inn of Court | Seattle
  • March 31, 2017News
    Lane Powell Achieves Trial Victory for Lundberg LLC
    Awards & Honors
  • February 9, 2017News
    Swanson Wins IP/Trademarks Lexology Client Choice Award
    Awards & Honors
  • January 25, 2017News
    Lane Powell and Attorneys Davis, Mehrbani, Jagla and Swanson Listed in 2017 World Trademark Review 1000
    Awards & Honors
  • December 8, 2016Event / CLE
    Third Annual Startups and Emerging Companies Seminar
    Lane Powell Seminar | Seattle
  • December 2, 2016Event / CLE
    Tips, Tricks and Traps for Information Technology Agreements
    Law Seminars International | Seattle
  • November 8, 2016Event / CLE
    Estate Planning for the Creative Person; Grantor Retained Annuity Trust Update and Operation Considerations
    Estate Planning Council of Seattle and the University of Washington School of Law | Seattle
  • October 11, 2016Event / CLE
    Tips and Tools to Manage Trademark Projects
    International Trademark Association | Seattle
  • September 30, 2016Publication
    Keeping It Confidential: How to Build a Better Nondisclosure Agreement
    Seattle Business Magazine
  • September 30, 2016Publication
    No Small Potatoes: Patenting Spuds in an Era of Gene Silencing
    Landslide
  • September 1, 2016Event / CLE
    Minimizing the Blind Spots: What the EO Lawyer Needs to Know About Trusts and Estate Planning and Administration
    Adler & Colvin | San Francisco
  • August 17, 2016News
    Fifty-one Lane Powell Attorneys Named in The Best Lawyers in America® 2017
    Awards & Honors
  • July 31, 2016Blog
    The Evolving Landscape of Copyright, Content Delivery and Fair Use in the CLE Context (Seattle)
  • July 11, 2016News
    Twenty-one Lane Powell Attorneys Recognized by Super Lawyers in Alaska and Oregon
    Awards & Honors
  • January 20, 2016News
    Lane Powell and Attorneys Davis, Mehrbani, Jagla and Swanson Named as ‘Top’ in 2016 World Trademark Review 1000
    Awards & Honors
  • November 25, 2015News
    Swanson Quoted in Law360 Article Regarding IP Malpractice Suits
    In the News
  • October 14, 2015Event / CLE
    The New Era of Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreements
    Washington Association of Corporate Counsel Continuing Legal Education | Seattle
  • October 12, 2015News
    Coughlan Joins Lane Powell’s Startups and Emerging Companies Practice Group
  • October 6, 2015Publication
    Lane Powell Featured in Puget Sound Business Journal Special Insert on Startups and Emerging Companies Seminar
    Puget Sound Business Journal
  • October 6, 2015News
    Lane Powell Wins Unanimous Victory for Keller Williams Alaska Group in Alaska Supreme Court
  • October 2, 2015Publication
    Intellectual Property: Should You File Trademark Applications On Your Own?
    Seattle Business
  • August 21, 2015Event / CLE
    Advanced Concepts in Licensing IP and Technology
    Seminar | Seattle
  • August 17, 2015News
    Forty-eight Lane Powell Attorneys Named in The Best Lawyers in America® 2016
    Awards & Honors
  • July 8, 2015News
    Fifteen Lane Powell Attorneys Named ‘Oregon Super Lawyers’ and Four Named as ‘Oregon Rising Stars’
    Awards & Honors
  • June 12, 2015News
    Thirty-two Lane Powell Attorneys Named ‘Washington Super Lawyers’ and 11 Named as ‘Washington Rising Stars’
    Awards & Honors
  • May 4, 2015Publication
    Back to the ‘Useful Arts’ — Supreme Court Reins in the Expansive Interpretation of Patent Eligibility
    Seattle Business
  • March 31, 2015Publication
    Online Contests: Make Them Effective by Simplifying the Mechanics
    Seattle Business
  • March 13, 2015Event / CLE
    Building Sustainable Regional Foodsheds
    Lewis & Clark Law School | Portland, Oregon
  • March 11, 2015Publication
    The ‘Legalities’ of Ambient Scent Marketing
    SoFAB Magazine
  • February 26, 2015Publication
    POM Wonderful: The New Prescription for False Advertising
    World Trademark Review
  • February 19, 2015News
    Lane Powell Named a ‘Go-To Law Firm®’ for 2015 by Corporate Counsel Magazine
  • February 11, 2015News
    Twenty-one Lane Powell Attorneys and 11 Practice Groups Recommended in Chambers® USA 2015
    Awards & Honors
  • February 9, 2015Publication
    Assessing the Validity of Food Processing Patents, Post-Alice
    Lane Powell White Paper
  • January 26, 2015News
    Lane Powell, Davis, Mehrbani, Jagla and Swanson Listed in 2015 World Trademark Review 1000
  • December 16, 2014News
    Degginger Quoted in Puget Sound Business Journal Article About Business Secrets and Working With Government Agencies
  • December 4, 2014Event / CLE
    Startups and Emerging Companies: Kick-start Your New Year
    Lane Powell Seminar | Seattle
  • November 26, 2014Publication
    Your Contract May Not Be as Confidential as You Think: Another Lesson in Safeguarding Trade Secrets in Government Procurement
    Construction Legal Update
  • November 7, 2014Event / CLE
    The ‘Legalities’ of Scent Marketing
    Southern Food and Beverage Institute | New Orleans, Louisiana
  • November 5, 2014News
    Lane Powell Featured in Puget Sound Business Journal Special Insert About Dec 4 Startups and Emerging Companies Seminar
    In the News
  • November 4, 2014Publication
    Why Plant Patenting Floats Free of GMO Crop Controversies
    Oregon Business magazine
  • November 4, 2014News
    U.S. News and Best Lawyers Ranks Lane Powell Among the Nation’s Top Law Firms
  • October 7, 2014News
    Lane Powell Named in ‘Who Represents America’s Biggest Companies 2014’ by Corporate Counsel Magazine
  • September 23, 2014Publication
    The Power of Smell: Scent Marketing Meets the Future of Gaming and Internet Surfing
    Seattle Business
  • September 10, 2014Event / CLE
    Diving Deeper Into the Licensor Side of Advanced Licensing Agreements
    Washington Association of Corporate Counsel | Seattle
  • August 18, 2014News
    Fifty-One Lane Powell Attorneys Named in The Best Lawyers in America® 2015
    Awards & Honors
  • July 9, 2014News
    Fifteen Lane Powell Attorneys Named ‘Oregon Super Lawyers’ and Five Named as ‘Oregon Rising Stars’
    Awards & Honors
  • June 13, 2014News
    Thirty-five Lane Powell Attorneys Named ‘Washington Super Lawyers’ and Fifteen Named as ‘Washington Rising Stars’
    Awards & Honors
  • June 6, 2014News
    Swanson Quoted in Law360 Article Regarding POM v. Coca-Cola Lanham Act Ruling
    In the News
  • March 11, 2014News
    Lane Powell, Davis, Mehrbani and Swanson Listed in 2014 World Trademark Review 1000
    Awards & Honors
  • August 9, 2011News
    Thirty-six Lane Powell Attorneys Listed as Top Lawyers in Seattle Metropolitan Magazine
    Awards & Honors
  • July 20, 2010News
    58 Lane Powell Attorneys Listed as Top Lawyers in Seattle Metropolitan Magazine
    Awards & Honors

Before proceeding, please note:  If you are not a current client of Lane Powell PC, please do not include any information in this email that you or someone else considers to be confidential or secret in nature.  Prior to the establishment of a lawyer-client relationship, unsolicited emails from non-clients containing confidential or secret information cannot be protected from disclosure.

back to top
  • Our Story

    • Overview
    • Careers
    • Locations
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Community Involvement
    • Firm Leadership
    • History
    • Alumni
    • Affiliations
    • Media Inquiries
    • Make a Payment
  • Our People

    • Our Insights

      • Events/CLE
      • Publications
      • News
      • Blogs
    • Our Practices & Industries

      • Business
      • Litigation
      • Industries
      • Services
      • View All

    Blogs

    Boom: The ERISA Law Blog
    Earth & Table Law Reporter

    • Site Map
    • Disclaimer
    • Data Privacy & Security
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    © 2023 Lane Powell PC Lane Powell & LP
    Logo, Reg. U.S. Pat. & Tm. Off.
    Sitemap
    Connect With Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Linkedin
    • Vimeo
    • Make a Payment