menu
  • Our Story

    • Overview
    • Careers
    • Locations
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Community Involvement
    • Firm Leadership
    • History
    • Alumni
    • Affiliations
    • Media Inquiries
    • Make a Payment
  • Our People

  • Our Insights

    • Events/CLE
    • Publications
    • News
    • Blogs
  • Our Practices & Industries

    • Business
      • Business Transitions
      • Construction
      • Corporate, Securities, and M&A
      • ERISA, Life, Health & Disability
      • Finance & Banking
      • Health Care Transactions
      • Immigration
      • Intellectual Property Transactions
      • Labor, Employment & Benefits
      • Private Investment Funds
      • Private Client Services
      • Real Estate
      • Startups & Emerging Companies
      • Tax
      • Wage & Hour
    • Litigation
      • Antitrust, Competition & Trade
      • Appellate
      • Class Actions
      • Commercial Litigation
      • Construction
      • Creditors' Rights & Bankruptcy
      • Electronic Discovery, Technology & Strategy
      • ERISA, Life, Health & Disability
      • Fiduciary Litigation
      • Financial Institutions Litigation & Investigations
      • Insurance
      • Intellectual Property Litigation
      • International Arbitration
      • Labor, Employment & Benefits
      • Securities & Corporate Governance Litigation
      • Wage & Hour
    • Industries
      • Blockchain & Cryptocurrency
      • Food, Beverage & Hospitality
      • Government Law
      • Investigations, Compliance & White Collar
      • Japan Practice
      • Nonprofit & Social Enterprise
      • Privacy & Data Security
      • Senior Living & Long Term Care
      • Transportation
    • Services
      • COVID-19 Landlord/Tenant Response Team
      • COVID-19 Resource Center
      • Business Dispute Resolution
  • Our Locations

    • Anchorage
    • Portland
    • Seattle
  • Our Careers

    • Attorneys
    • Summer Associates
    • Professional Staff
  • Our Diversity

    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Our Story
Lane Powell Web Site
  • OUR PEOPLE
  • STORY
  • INSIGHTS
  • PRACTICES & INDUSTRIES
Search
  • 日本語
  • 中文
  • 한국어
Email this pagePrint this pagePrint to PDF

Related People

  • Tiffany Connors

Related Practices & Industries

  • Intellectual Property Litigation
  • Litigation
March 31, 2017News

Lane Powell Achieves Trial Victory for Lundberg LLC

Awards & Honors

Lane Powell achieved a significant trial victory for client Lundberg LLC in A.H. Lundberg Associates, Inc. v. TSI Inc., case number 2:14-cv-01160, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. The case arose from allegations that Lundberg’s former business partner TSI stole confidential information and trade secrets to launch their own competing air pollution control equipment line. In September 2016, a jury awarded Lundberg $5.1 million in damages for trade secret misappropriation and breach of a non-disclosure agreement.

After the jury verdict, TSI urged Judge James Robart to overturn and dismiss the verdict, claiming that there is no evidence of legally protectable trade secrets. However, earlier this month, Judge Robart denied the motion for judgment and ordered TSI to pay $1 million in exemplary damages and approximately $1.2 million in attorneys’ fees on top of the initial verdict. Additionally, he granted Lundberg’s injunctive relief bid, ordering TSI to stop using Lundberg’s air pollution technology and to destroy all products and parts derived using Lundberg’s trade secrets.

“Lundberg is ‘more than happy’ with the post-trial orders, and the company plans to ‘vigorously’ pursue collection on the judgments,” says Randy Beighle, who led the Lane Powell team. He adds that “the judge’s ruling is a strong indication that he believed Lundberg had been wronged.”

Randy Beighle, Kristin Beneski, Brian Bodine and Tiffany Scott Connors represented Lundberg in the matter.

Before proceeding, please note:  If you are not a current client of Lane Powell PC, please do not include any information in this email that you or someone else considers to be confidential or secret in nature.  Prior to the establishment of a lawyer-client relationship, unsolicited emails from non-clients containing confidential or secret information cannot be protected from disclosure.

back to top
  • Our Story

    • Overview
    • Careers
    • Locations
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Community Involvement
    • Firm Leadership
    • History
    • Alumni
    • Affiliations
    • Media Inquiries
    • Make a Payment
  • Our People

    • Our Insights

      • Events/CLE
      • Publications
      • News
      • Blogs
    • Our Practices & Industries

      • Business
      • Litigation
      • Industries
      • Services
      • View All

    Blogs

    Boom: The ERISA Law Blog
    Earth & Table Law Reporter

    • Site Map
    • Disclaimer
    • Data Privacy & Security
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    © 2023 Lane Powell PC Lane Powell & LP
    Logo, Reg. U.S. Pat. & Tm. Off.
    Sitemap
    Connect With Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Linkedin
    • Vimeo
    • Make a Payment