Email this page Print this page Print to PDF

Scott

Scott M. Edwards

Shareholder

Scott Edwards advises clients on state and local tax matters. His experience spans the full business and tax spectrum, ranging from tax planning and transactional matters to tax controversy and litigation.

Scott helps clients minimize the tax costs of doing business, offering advice on entity formation and structuring transactions including sales and acquisitions of businesses and real estate. While focusing on gross receipts taxes — particularly Washington’s B&O tax, and sales and use taxes — his practice covers the full range of state and local taxes.

Scott represents clients in the course of tax controversies including audits, administrative appeals, tax refund claims and litigation. He has tried numerous cases before the Washington State Department of Revenue, and more than 10 before the Washington Supreme Court.

Scott advises clients in a wide array of industries including financial institutions, manufacturers, retailers, service providers, technology, aircraft owners and operators, and senior living.

Experience

Litigation Experience

Burke, et al., v. City of Seattle
King County Superior Court
Represented plaintiffs challenging Seattle’s progressive income tax ordinance. The trial court ruled that (1) Seattle does not have statutory authority to impose an income tax and (2) Seattle’s tax violated a state statute expressly prohibiting cities from imposing income taxes.
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Clyde Hill
374 P.3d 151 (Wash. 2015)Washington Supreme Court
Represented taxpayer in matter addressing the right to challenge a municipal assessment through a declaratory judgment proceeding. The Supreme. The court upheld the taxpayer’s right to bring a declaratory judgment action.
HomeStreet, Inc. v. State of Washington Department of Revenue
Washington Supreme Court
Represented taxpayer in a matter addressing the deductibility of interest income derived from residential first mortgage loans that were securitized on a servicing retained basis. The Legislature subsequently codified the Supreme Court’s favorable ruling.
Agrilink Foods, Inc. v. Washington Department of Revenue*
Washington Supreme Court
Represented taxpayer in a matter addressing the B&O tax classification of chilli manufacturing. Favorable Supreme Court ruling reaffirmed principle that ambiguous tax imposition statutes must be construed in favor of taxpayers.
Samis Land Co. v. City of Soap Lake*
Washington Supreme Court
Represented landowner challenging local assessment as an unconstitutional property tax. In striking down assessment Supreme Court reaffirmed test for distinguishing taxes subject to constitutional limitations from fees limited only by a municipality’s general police powers.
Gabelein v. Diking District No. 1 of Island County
Washington Court of Appeals
Represented Diking District in challenge to method by which District developed its benefit assessment roll.
InterCambio Express v. Department of Revenue
Thurston County Superior Court
Represented taxpayer in matter addressing how receipts from money transfer services are sourced. Department subsequently adopted trial court's ruling for taxpayer in a published excise tax advisory.
Avanade, Inc. v. City of Seattle
Washington Court of Appeals
Represented taxpayer in challenge to unfairly apportioned city tax.
KMS Financial Servs., Inc. v. City of Seattle*
Washington Court of Appeals
Represented taxpayer in challenge to unfairly apportioned city tax.
Corporate Express Office Products, Inc. v. City of Seattle*
Washington Court of Appeals
Represented taxpayer in city's appeal of an administrative ruling granting taxpayer a refund.
City of Tacoma v. Mary Kay, Inc*
Washington Court of Appeals
Represented taxpayer in City's appeal of an administrative ruling granting taxpayer a refund.
Shell Oil Co. v. Washington Department of Revenue*
Represented Shell Oil Co. in appeal regarding proper valuation of barter transactions.
Estate of Kurt Cobain v. Washington Department of Revenue*
Thurston County Superior Court
Successful refund suit challenging whether estate was engaged in business.

* Denotes experience at a previous firm

Professional Experience

University of Washington School of Law, Seattle, Adjunct Professor of Law (Tax) (2000-Present)

Journal of Multistate Taxation and Incentives, Associate Editor (1998-2015)

Perkins Coie

Chair, State and Local Tax Practice (2009-2010)
Partner (2000-2010)

Bogle & Gates, Senior Attorney (1996-1999)

Community Involvement

American Bar Association, Section of Taxation, State and Local Tax Committee

Co-chair, Miscellaneous Taxes (Including Gross Receipts Taxes) Subcommittee

Association of Washington Business

Legal Affairs Council
Tax and Fiscal Policy Committee

American Red Cross, Western Washington Region

Member, Board of the Directors (2006-2015)
Former Chair, Finance Committee
Former Chair, Treasurer

Washington Research Council, Executive Committee

Chair (2017)
Member (2012-Present)

Chair, St. Cecilia Parish Finance Council

Thought Leadership

April 3, 2020News
Edwards Quoted in Law360 Article ‘Seattle Officials Call for Moving Up ‘Amazon Tax’ Start Date’
In the News
April 3, 2020News
Washington Supreme Court Denies Review of Seattle Income Tax
Firm Announcement
April 2, 2020Publication
Washington DOR Response to COVID-19: What You Need to Know About Tax Due Dates & Extensions
COVID-19 Resource
March 25, 2020Publication
Anticipated Provisions in the Relief for Workers Affected by Coronavirus Act
COVID-19 Resource
March 18, 2020Publication
Tax Traps and Opportunities From Employers Requiring Employees to Work From Home
COVID-19 Resource
June 10, 2019News
Thirty-one Lane Powell Attorneys Named ‘Washington Super Lawyers’ and Nine Named ‘Washington Rising Stars’
Awards & Honors
June 7, 2019Event / CLE
‘The Art of Making Sausage’: Behind the Scenes of the 2019 Washington Legislative Session
Institute for Professionals in Taxation | Issaquah, Washington
May 21, 2019Event / CLE
Local Government Apportionment: Now and Then
Washington Society of Certified Public Accountants | Burien, Washington
April 29, 2019Publication
Washington State Legislature Passes Massive Tax Increases
Tax Legal Update
June 18, 2018News
Thirty-two Lane Powell Attorneys Named ‘Washington Super Lawyers’ and 14 Named ‘Washington Rising Stars’
Awards & Honors
February 27, 2018Publication
Blue States Try to Rescue SALT Deductions With Charitable Contributions
Tax Reform Update
February 14, 2018Event / CLE
Ambiguities in States Market Sourcing Laws Spur New Rulemaking
American Bar Association | San Diego
November 1, 2017Event / CLE
Pacific Northwest Regional Tax Seminar
Council on State Taxation | Portland, Oregon
August 15, 2017News
Fifty-nine Lane Powell Attorneys Named in The Best Lawyers® in America 2018
Awards & Honors
July 12, 2017Publication
Brace for Lawsuits: Seattle’s Income Tax on High-Earners Will Likely Face Legal Challenges
Puget Sound Business Journal
June 9, 2017News
Thirty-one Lane Powell Attorneys Named ‘Washington Super Lawyers’ and 16 Named ‘Washington Rising Stars’
Awards & Honors
June 2, 2017Publication
Seattle’s Proposed Income Tax Is ‘Deep-Pocket Tax Fishing,’ Faces Legal Challenges
Puget Sound Business Journal
August 17, 2016News
Fifty-one Lane Powell Attorneys Named in The Best Lawyers in America® 2017
Awards & Honors
May 26, 2016Event / CLE
States Are Interested in You: State Expansion of Nexus Concepts in Business Taxes
Institute for Professionals in Taxation | Seattle
August 17, 2015News
Forty-eight Lane Powell Attorneys Named in The Best Lawyers in America® 2016
Awards & Honors
August 12, 2015News
Edwards Quoted in Tax Notes Article Regarding Washington State’s New Nexus Provisions
In the News
August 3, 2015Publication
Be Aware: Washington DOR Forming Unit to Enforce New B&O Tax on Out-of-State Wholesalers
Tax Legal Update
June 12, 2015News
Thirty-two Lane Powell Attorneys Named ‘Washington Super Lawyers’ and 11 Named as ‘Washington Rising Stars’
Awards & Honors
January 20, 2015Publication
Governor Inslee Proposes $1.5 Billion of New Revenue, Including a 7 Percent Personal Tax on Capital Gains
Tax Legal Update
December 29, 2014Publication
State Supreme Court Rules on Scope of B&O Tax Mortgage Interest Deduction
Issues and Answers
November 24, 2014News
Edwards Quoted in Washington State Wire Article About the Department of Revenue’s Internal Appeal System
November 4, 2014Event / CLE
Current Trends and State Initiatives: Their Impact on Sales and Use Tax Audits; Discovery Issues in Tax Disputes
Sales and Use | Vancouver, Washington
September 30, 2014Event / CLE
What Is Fair Apportionment and How Do I Get It?
Webinar
August 18, 2014News
Fifty-One Lane Powell Attorneys Named in The Best Lawyers in America® 2015
Awards & Honors
August 5, 2014Publication
Senseless (in) Seattle: Confusing Application of City’s B&O Tax Leaves Services Businesses in a Quandary
Seattle Business
June 13, 2014News
Thirty-five Lane Powell Attorneys Named ‘Washington Super Lawyers’ and Fifteen Named as ‘Washington Rising Stars’
Awards & Honors
June 14, 2013News
Thirty-Six Lane Powell Attorneys Named ‘Washington Super Lawyers’ and Sixteen Named as ‘Washington Rising Stars’
Awards & Honors
June 13, 2012News
28 Lane Powell Attorneys Named ‘Washington Super Lawyers;’ 12 Named as ‘Washington Rising Stars’
Awards & Honors

Practices & Industries

Cannabis
Government Law
Nonprofit & Social Enterprise
Tax
Tax Reform
Transportation

Education

University of Washington School of Law, J.D., with honors, 1991
Princeton University, B.A., magna cum laude, 1988

Admissions

Washington
U.S. Supreme Court
U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey
U.S. Court of International Trade

Honors

“Washington Super Lawyer,” Thomson Reuters, Tax (2012-2019)

Avvo Rated 10/10 “Superb”

Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Lane Powell PC, please do not include any information in this email that you or someone else considers to be confidential or secret in nature. Prior to the establishment of a lawyer-client relationship, unsolicited emails from non-clients containing confidential or secret information cannot be protected from disclosure.