We represented plaintiffs challenging Seattle’s progressive income tax ordinance. The trial court ruled that (1) Seattle does not have statutory authority to impose an income tax and (2) Seattle’s tax violated a state statute expressly prohibiting cities from imposing income taxes. Having found the tax invalid on statutory grounds, the court agreed with the taxpayers that under the doctrine of constitutional avoidance, it was unnecessary to address whether the tax also violates the state constitution.
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Lane Powell PC, please do not include any information in this email that you or someone else considers to be confidential or secret in nature. Prior to the establishment of a lawyer-client relationship, unsolicited emails from non-clients containing confidential or secret information cannot be protected from disclosure.