Recent Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) enforcement actions relating to personal use of business aircraft should serve as a reminder to public companies to review their executives’ perquisite disclosure policies and procedures. Over the past few months, the SEC has brought a number of enforcement actions relating to a public company’s failure to properly disclose their executives’ personal use of company aircraft in the company’s proxy statement.
In July, the SEC charged the former CEO of Energy XXI Ltd. for failure to disclose perquisites and other undisclosed personal loans and related-party transactions. According to the SEC, the executive failed to disclose expenses that were “unreasonable, personal in nature, and/or not supported by sufficient documentation,” including the use of the company’s aircraft to attend a football game at the CEO’s alma mater with other industry executives.
In another case, the SEC brought an enforcement action against a company for failure to identify and disclose perquisites (which included the executive’s use of the company’s corporate aircraft) provided to the company’s executive officer. The SEC concluded that the company had inadequate processes and procedures in place to ensure proper reporting of perquisites and that the company had failed to adequately train its employees to prepare the Compensation Discussion and Analysis portion of its proxy statements filed with the SEC.
Perks Are Required to Be Disclosed in a Public Company’s Proxy Statement
These recent SEC enforcement actions highlight the SEC’s continuing focus on executive perquisites and underscore the importance for in-house flight and legal departments to identify, document and report the use of the company’s aircraft by executives. Publicly traded companies are required to disclose all compensation paid to their named executive officers (NEOs) (i.e., a company’s CEO, CFO and the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the CEO and CFO) in the company’s proxy statement filed annually with the SEC. The SEC’s rules generally require all perquisites and personal benefits provided to an NEO that exceed $10,000 in the aggregate in a fiscal year to be disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table of the company’s proxy statement.
Further, in preparing the Summary Compensation Table, companies should apply the SEC’s more stringent standard for determining whether an item is a “perquisite.” The SEC’s more stringent standard provides that:
Accordingly, the use of a public company’s aircraft by an NEO, their family members or guests for any personal purpose triggers disclosure with the SEC and the aggregate incremental cost (AIC) associated with the personal flight must be reported. AIC means the cost to the company of the personal flight, not the value of the benefit received by the executive or the tax value (e.g., SIFL rates) of the benefit. Generally, the incremental costs will include the variable and direct costs associated with operating the flight, such as fuel, airport fees and catering, and a proportionate share of the aircraft’s operating costs such as airframe, engines and maintenance.
William Lin is a Shareholder in the Seattle Office of Lane Powell PC.
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Lane Powell PC, please do not include any information in this email that you or someone else considers to be confidential or secret in nature. Prior to the establishment of a lawyer-client relationship, unsolicited emails from non-clients containing confidential or secret information cannot be protected from disclosure.