The stalemate in Congress over supplemental unemployment benefits during the COVID-19 pandemic, and President Trump’s most recent proclamations of relief, leave employers caught in the middle. A key component of the President’s initiatives includes a Social Security tax holiday for employees, but that effort is causing chaos not only because it may not be enforceable but also because it tries to defer but does not (and cannot) eliminate the tax obligation. Accordingly, it leaves employers both confused how to implement and vulnerable to penalties if they get it wrong. For now, the best approach is to do nothing.
Congressionally sanctioned supplemental unemployment benefits of $600/week expired at the end of July, risking an economic train wreck for the tens of millions of unemployed — and a political train wreck for any elected official who fails to act like they care. But members of Congress remain unable to agree on the next federal stimulus package. Although President Trump blames Speaker Pelosi and the Democrats for intransigence, viewers of this political theatre know that the Senate Republicans are insufficiently supportive of Majority Leader McConnell on the nature and scope of the next stimulus package to enable negotiation of a compromise between the House’s $3 Trillion HEROES bill and the Senate’s $1 Trillion HEALS bill.
So on August 8, President Trump took matters into his own hands and issued three memoranda and an executive order, as described by the NYT here, the WSJ here and the Washington Post here.1 This article focuses on the Memorandum on Deferring Payroll Tax Obligations in Light of the Ongoing COVID-19 Disaster (the Memorandum), which is intended to provide payroll tax relief to American workers earning less than an annualized rate of $104,000/year in any pay period — because that initiative requires cooperation by employers.
Before examining the President’s actions, let’s take a quick detour to ensure that everyone understands what we are talking about here. Payroll taxes generally refer to an employer’s obligations with respect to FICA, income tax withholding and unemployment taxes (and can include other state or local taxes). President Trump’s actions concern FICA, which consists of two components: Social Security tax and Medicare tax. These taxes are generally split evenly between employers and employees with the employee’s share deducted from the employee’s paychecks. In general, the employer and employee each pay Social Security tax equal to 6.2 percent of an employee’s wages up to the taxable “wage base,” an inflation-adjusted amount which is $137,700 for 2020. For most workers, the employer and employee Medicare tax equals 1.45 percent of an employee’s wages with no comparable wage base. President Trump’s Memoranda only affects the employee portion of Social Security taxes, not the Medicare tax.
As we discussed in previous articles (here and here), Congress formerly allowed employers to delay payment of the employer portion of Social Security taxes accruing between March 27 and December 31. President Trump has now attempted to provide a similar benefit for the employee portion, with a promise to eliminate any repayment obligation if he is re-elected.
The Memorandum provides no details on implementation and is not self-executing. Rather, it directs the Secretary of Treasury to use his authority to defer the withholding of the employee portion of Social Security (not Medicare) tax from an employee’s paychecks issued between September 1 and December 31 if employee’s annualized compensation is less than $104,000 (e.g., biweekly wages of less than $4,000).
Other key things to note about the Memorandum include:
This issue is mired in politics, and we are not taking sides. We can say that it is far from clear that the President has the unilateral authority to suspend withholding of the employee portion of Social Security taxes. Congress may yet take action on a new stimulus package and make the social security tax holiday issue moot or clear. If not, we anticipate litigation.
We recommend waiting for guidance from the Treasury Department before taking any action. The effective date is still three weeks away, and we are likely to know much more by then. Meanwhile, if employees inquire about “releasing” their share of Social Security taxes as part of their paychecks, we recommend a simple response: we are awaiting guidance and will follow the law. Unless, of course, you are eager to become the test case for litigating in this politically charged environment.
Determining how best to meet your business needs during these uncertain times can be challenging. Lane Powell’s team of attorneys are here to help you develop and implement the strategy that supports your business and your employees. For more information, consult Lane Powell’s COVID-19 Resource Center or the authors of this article, Lewis Horowitz and Eric Kodesch.
1 Those reading these articles can be forgiven if they fail to realize that they seem to reflect three sides of the same coin.
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Lane Powell PC, please do not include any information in this email that you or someone else considers to be confidential or secret in nature. Prior to the establishment of a lawyer-client relationship, unsolicited emails from non-clients containing confidential or secret information cannot be protected from disclosure.