menu
  • Our Story

    • Overview
    • Careers
    • Locations
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Community Involvement
    • Firm Leadership
    • History
    • Alumni
    • Affiliations
    • Media Inquiries
    • Make a Payment
  • Our People

  • Our Insights

    • Events/CLE
    • Publications
    • News
    • Blogs
  • Our Practices & Industries

    • Business
      • Business Transitions
      • Construction
      • Corporate, Securities, and M&A
      • ERISA, Life, Health & Disability
      • Finance & Banking
      • Health Care Transactions
      • Immigration
      • Intellectual Property Transactions
      • Labor, Employment & Benefits
      • Private Investment Funds
      • Private Client Services
      • Real Estate
      • Startups & Emerging Companies
      • Tax
      • Wage & Hour
    • Litigation
      • Antitrust, Competition & Trade
      • Appellate
      • Class Actions
      • Commercial Litigation
      • Construction
      • Creditors' Rights & Bankruptcy
      • Electronic Discovery, Technology & Strategy
      • ERISA, Life, Health & Disability
      • Fiduciary Litigation
      • Financial Institutions Litigation & Investigations
      • Insurance
      • Intellectual Property Litigation
      • International Arbitration
      • Labor, Employment & Benefits
      • Securities & Corporate Governance Litigation
      • Wage & Hour
    • Industries
      • Blockchain & Cryptocurrency
      • Food, Beverage & Hospitality
      • Government Law
      • Investigations, Compliance & White Collar
      • Japan Practice
      • Nonprofit & Social Enterprise
      • Privacy & Data Security
      • Senior Living & Long Term Care
      • Transportation
    • Services
      • COVID-19 Landlord/Tenant Response Team
      • COVID-19 Resource Center
      • Business Dispute Resolution
  • Our Locations

    • Anchorage
    • Portland
    • Seattle
  • Our Careers

    • Attorneys
    • Summer Associates
    • Professional Staff
  • Our Diversity

    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Our Story
Lane Powell Web Site
  • OUR PEOPLE
  • STORY
  • INSIGHTS
  • PRACTICES & INDUSTRIES
Search
  • 日本語
  • 中文
  • 한국어
Email this pagePrint this pagePrint to PDF

Topics

  • COVID-19
  • Real Estate

Related People

  • Jeremy R. Bader
  • Elizabeth A. Davis

Related Practices & Industries

  • Business
  • COVID-19 Resource Center
  • Real Estate
July 1, 2020Publication

Oregon Legislature Continues Eviction Moratorium

COVID-19 Resource

Update: Oregon’s Eviction Moratorium “Emergency Period” is now extended until December 31. By Executive Order 20-56, Governor Kate Brown has extended the emergency period for residential leases until the end of 2020. The six-month grace period for repayment of back rent now expires June 30, 2021. The order did not extend the emergency period for commercial leases, which expired September 30 as provided in HB 4213.


Governor Brown has signed HB 4213 into law, just in time to replace her earlier Executive Order 20-13, which expired July 1. The bill prohibits residential and commercial evictions until September 30, 2020. 

EO 20-13 suspended certain lease terminations and evictions due to COVID-19. HB 4213 extends that eviction moratorium through September 30 and extends the deadline to repay past-due rent until March 31, 2021. The bill also expands the payment items that may be postponed, creates complex notice requirements for both landlords and tenants, and provides damages for non-compliance.

Unlike EO 20-13, which required commercial tenants to provide “documentation or other evidence that nonpayment is caused by * * * the COVID-19 pandemic[,]” HB 4213 excuses “nonpayment” during the “emergency period,” regardless of cause. Also unlike the executive order, HB 4213 does not require tenants to continue to make partial rent payments to the extent they are financially able to do so.

Commercial Evictions

HB 4213 prohibits all commercial eviction activity for nonpayment from April 1 through September 30 (the emergency period). “Nonpayment” excuses late payment of “rent, late charges, utility charges, or any other service charge or fee” that becomes due during the emergency period.

The bill prohibits the delivery of a termination notice or any other action that would interfere with a tenant’s possession or use of a leased premises due to nonpayment during the emergency period. Additionally, a landlord may not initiate or continue eviction proceedings based on a previously delivered termination notice, if the notice was delivered after April 1. Late charges and other penalties for nonpayment during the emergency period are also prohibited.

After the end of the emergency period, tenants will have six months (until March 31, 2021) to repay all unpaid rent, utilities and other charges incurred during the emergency period. Tenants must pay ongoing rent during this repayment period, but they may not be evicted for failure to repay back rent (and other charges) until the end of the repayment period.

Beginning October 1, a landlord may provide written notice with specified information, including the following: the nonpayment balance, the six-month repayment period option, and a reminder that the landlord may terminate the tenancy if rents and other payments that become due after the emergency period are not timely paid. A tenant must respond within 14 days of delivery of such notice, and either repay the outstanding balance or give notice that it intends to take advantage of the six-month repayment period.

HB 4213 imposes penalties on both landlords and tenants. If a landlord violates the requirements of the bill, a tenant may obtain injunctive relief to recover possession or address any other violation and may recover up to three months’ periodic rent plus actual damages. If a tenant fails to respond to the landlord’s repayment notice outlined above, the landlord may recover damages equal to 50 percent of one month’s rent. 

Residential Evictions

HB 4213 contains additional provisions that apply only to residential evictions, including prohibitions on certain “no cause” evictions otherwise permitted by the Oregon Residential Landlord Tenant Act.

Oregon Constitution Article I, Section 21

HB 4213 may be subject to constitutional challenge as a law impairing contractual obligations. Until such issues are settled by the courts, however, both landlords and tenants should plan to act in accordance with the provisions of HB 4213.

Before proceeding, please note:  If you are not a current client of Lane Powell PC, please do not include any information in this email that you or someone else considers to be confidential or secret in nature.  Prior to the establishment of a lawyer-client relationship, unsolicited emails from non-clients containing confidential or secret information cannot be protected from disclosure.

back to top
  • Our Story

    • Overview
    • Careers
    • Locations
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Pro Bono
    • Community Involvement
    • Firm Leadership
    • History
    • Alumni
    • Affiliations
    • Media Inquiries
    • Make a Payment
  • Our People

    • Our Insights

      • Events/CLE
      • Publications
      • News
      • Blogs
    • Our Practices & Industries

      • Business
      • Litigation
      • Industries
      • Services
      • View All

    Blogs

    Boom: The ERISA Law Blog
    Earth & Table Law Reporter

    • Site Map
    • Disclaimer
    • Data Privacy & Security
    • Contact Us
    • Subscribe
    © 2023 Lane Powell PC Lane Powell & LP
    Logo, Reg. U.S. Pat. & Tm. Off.
    Sitemap
    Connect With Us
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • Linkedin
    • Vimeo
    • Make a Payment