News & Events

News & Events


Supreme Court’s Omnicare Decision Follows Middle Path Advocated by Lane Powell and Washington Legal Foundation

Bookmark and Share

By Douglas W. Greene and Claire Loebs Davis

In the March 24 opinion issued in Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund (Omnicare), the Supreme Court rejected the two extremes advocated by the parties regarding how the truth or falsity of statements of opinion should be considered under the securities laws, and instead adopted the middle path advocated in the amicus brief filed by Lane Powell on behalf of the Washington Legal Foundation (WLF). In doing so, the Court also laid out a blueprint for examining claims of falsity under the securities laws, which we believe will do for falsity analysis what Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd., 551 U.S. 308 (2007), did for scienter analysis.

View the full article (PDF) to learn more about the Omnicare opinion.

For more information, please contact the Securities Group at Lane Powell:

206.223.7000 Seattle
503.778.2100 Portland
907.277.9511 Anchorage