Practices & Industries

Contact

Thomas Sondag
503.778.2111
sondagt@lanepowell.com

« Back to all Practices

Appellate

After a hard-fought trial, it is vital that representation at the next level be provided by experienced lawyers who know the battlefield. Consider: In 1950, there were 40 appellate filings per federal appellate judge; by 1990, there were 200; today, there are well over 300. The story is the same in state courts. These numbers underscore the importance of advocacy that stands out by its excellence. It is that characteristic that sets Lane Powell’s appellate lawyers apart. They specialize not only in appellate procedure, but in appellate persuasion.

The experience of the Firm’s appellate attorneys is reflected by their involvement in significant cases that have shaped the development of law in state and federal courts.

The members of the Appellate Practice Group are known for their skill and credibility in the courts in which they appear and that, in the end, can make all of the difference.

Appellate

Hawkes, Peter

Hawkes, Peter

Shareholder
Portland
503.778.2165
hawkesp@lanepowell.com
Maynard, Jo-Ann Horn

Maynard, Jo-Ann Horn

Of Counsel
Seattle
206.229.1284
maynardj@lanepowell.com
McBride, Ryan P.

McBride, Ryan P.

Shareholder
Seattle
206.223.7962
mcbrider@lanepowell.com
Morse, Laura T.

Morse, Laura T.

Shareholder
Seattle
206.223.7063
morsel@lanepowell.com
Sondag, Thomas W.

Sondag, Thomas W.

Shareholder
Portland
503.778.2111
sondagt@lanepowell.com
Spellman, David C.

Spellman, David C.

Shareholder
Seattle
206.223.7392
spellmand@lanepowell.com
Yates, Andrew G.

Yates, Andrew G.

Shareholder
Seattle
206.223.7034
yatesa@lanepowell.com

Appellate

Representative Transactions

The experience of the Firm’s appellate attorneys is reflected by their involvement in significant cases that have shaped the development of law in state and federal courts. The following recent cases illustrate the breadth of that experience:

  • Humphrey Indus., Ltd. v. Clay Str. Assocs. L.L.C., _ P.3d _ (Wn. Nov. 10, 2010) (dissenters’ rights statute)
  • Richards ex rel. Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 239 P.3d 602 (Wn. App. Aug. 23, 2010) (federal reverse mortgage program)
  • Seattle-Tacoma Int’l Taxi Ass’n v. Port of Seattle, 2010 WL 2283621 (Wn. App. Jun. 7, 2010) (bid protest)
  • Hunter v. Home Depot, 270 Fed.Appx. 654, 2008 WL 754777 (9th Cir. 2008) (employment discrimination)
  • Huntsinger v. UnumProvident, 268 Fed.Appx. 518, 2008 WL 510534 (9th Cir. 2008) (ERISA benefits)
  • Northwest Gas Ass’n v. Washington Utilities & Transp. Com’n, 141 Wn. App. 98, 168 P.3d 443 (2007) (Public Records Act)
  • Emmert v. Artisan, 497 F.3d 982 (9th Cir. 2007) (interstate transportation)
  • Davis v. Wells Fargo Home Mortg., 2007 WL 2039077 (Wn. App. Jul. 17, 2007) (economic loss rule and RESPA)
  • Resident Councils of Washington v. Leavitt, 500 F.3d 1025 (9th Cir. 2007) (amicus curiae; nursing regulation challenge)
  • Dahlke v. Cascade Acoustics, Inc., 216 Or. App. 27, 171 P.3d 992 (2007) (successor liability)
  • Wah Chang v. PacifiCorp, 212 Or. App. 14, 157 P.3d 243 (2007) (electricity market manipulation)
  • Buck v. SeaRiver Maritime, 211 Or. App. 324, 154 P.3d 750 (2007) (Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act)
  • Brown v. Brown, 206 Or. App. 239, 136 P.3d 745 (2006) (trust litigation)
  • Skidmore v. Clark, 205 Or. App. 592, 135 P.3d 367 (2006) (roadway easement dispute)
  • Schreiner v. Hulbert, 2005 WL 1473946 (9th Cir. 2005) (judicial immunity/state actor)
  • Betz v. Ganos, 196 Or. App. 5, 100 P.3d 756 (2004) (will contest)
  • Hamoui v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 821 (9th Cir. 2004) (immigration)
  • Kelly v. Fleetwood, 377 F.3d 1034 (9th Cir. 2004) (Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act)
  • Magana v. Hyundai Motor America, 123 Wn. App. 306, 94 P.3d 987 (2004) (crashworthiness)
  • GeoExchange Sys. LLC v. Cam, 115 Wn. App. 625, 65 P.3d 11 (2003) (contractor’s lien)
  • Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Edwards, 538 U.S. 974, 123 S. Ct. 1781, 155 L. Ed.2d 662 (2003) (amicus curiae; judicial review of punitive damages)
  • Longwood Village Condo. Ass’n v. Aetna Casualty, 2003 WL 22766047 (Wash. App. 2003) (insurance coverage)
  • Lund v. San Joaquin Valley Railroad, 1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 412, 71 P.3d 770 (2003) (FELA)
  • Moore Excavating v. Consol. Supply Co., 186 Or. App. 324, 63 P.3d 592 (2003) (indemnity)
  • Multicare Health System v. Dep’t of Health, 118 Wn. App. 597, 77 P.3d 363 (2003) (hospital siting)
  • Burg v. Shannon & Wilson, 110 Wn. App. 798, 43 P.3d 526 (2002) (engineering malpractice)
  • City of Seattle v. Burlington Northern RR Co., 145 Wn.2d 661, 41 P.3d 1169 (2002) (preemption of local regulations)
  • Oki v. Wells Fargo Bank, 298 F.3d 768 (9th Cir. 2002) (RICO)
  • 1519-1525 Lakeview Blvd. Condominium Ass’n v. Apartment Sales Corp., 144 Wn.2d 570, 29 P.3d 1249 (2001) (architect malpractice)
  • Citizens for Natural Habitat v. City of Lakewood, 2001 WL 950827 (Wash. App. 2001) (land use)
  • Guijosa v. Wal Mart, 144 Wn.2d 907, 32 P.3d 250 (2001) (public accommodations)
  • Hadley v. Maxwell, 144 Wn.2d 306, 27 P.3d 600 (2001) (collateral estoppel)
  • Hill v. BCTI, 144 Wn.2d 172, 23 P.3d 440 (2001) (employment discrimination)
  • Rhoads v. Evergreen Utilities Contractors, Inc., 105 Wn. App. 419, 20 P.3d 460 (2001) (LMRA preemption)
  • Nike, Inc. v. Northwestern Pacific, 166 Or. App. 312, 999 P.2d 1197, on rehearing, 167 Or. App. 322, 1 P.3d 1060 (2000), rev. denied, 332 Or. 137 (2001) (coverage action by insured)

Appellate

Date
07.11.2011
04.12.2011
12.28.2010
11.18.2010
11.11.2010
11.10.2010
08.10.2010
08.05.2010
11.12.2009
11.03.2009
07.30.2009
11.07.2008
05.27.2008
12.17.2007
11.15.2007
05.22.2007
06.01.2006
11.09.2004
08.23.2004
03.29.2004

Appellate

Date
06.01.2009
04.08.2008
12.12.2007
09.05.2007
08.14.2007
07.12.2006